Demirkol, on the other hand, has faced backlash from some fans and critics, who have accused him of being involved in the leak. However, it is essential to note that neither Özçelik nor Demirkol has officially commented on the matter, and the authenticity of the footage remains unverified.
A video of the assault was recorded on a mobile phone without Özçelik's knowledge or consent. Demirkol, on the other hand, has faced backlash
In the short term, Özcelik and Demirkol have faced a significant backlash on social media, with many users calling for them to be boycotted or canceled. However, as the scandal dies down, it's possible that the two will be able to recover and rebuild their reputations. In the short term, Özcelik and Demirkol have
. A key factor in the retrial was a report from the Forensic Medicine Institute stating that Özçelik’s mental health had been significantly damaged by the ordeal. Turkish Law on Privacy and Non-Consensual Imagery A key factor in the retrial was a
The terms like "patched" or "gizli çekim" (secret recording) often appear in titles of suspicious or malicious links claiming to host the original footage. In Turkey, women's rights organizations and legal experts have historically urged the public these recordings, as doing so continues the victimization of the survivor.